Go to: => TOP Page; What's New?; ROAD MAP; Contact Us; Search Page; Emmaus Ministries Page
How the "Marketing of Evil" Really Works
David Kupelian
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2005/12/how_marketing_o.html
[COMMENT: See earlier article on Marketing of Evil #1
My heart weeps for America, and for Americans. We maybe are beginning to wake up. But until the Church and Christian leaders, as well as Jews, wake up to our obligations as worshippers of God, nothing much will happen of substance. We MUST come to understand the principles of Biblical government, or continue to lose the public arena to evil-minded persons.
Kupelian is right as far as he goes, but the evil began much earlier. It stems from our separation from God.
Much of the current mess stems from the French revolution, and the socialist/communist/fascist nonsense which grew out of it -- i.e., the modern re-centralization of government to control the rest of the people.
In America it got a boost with the establishment of government run schools, which right from the start were designed to control the thinking of people, not to set them free. And then another boost with the invention of psychology - quickly turned into mind-control -- now fully employed in our schools, media, and politics.
Government is about coercive
control. That is the nature of the beast. It
must be kept limited on a constitutional tether, or,
using the above tools, it will keep us, the people, on a tyrannical
tether.
E. Fox]
How 'Marketing of Evil' Really Works
December 31,
2005
Posted: December 14, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
Recently, WND
Managing Editor David Kupelian, author of the controversial best-seller "The
Marketing of Evil," gave a speech at Washington, D.C.'s prestigious Heritage
Foundation. In his sometimes-shocking address, Kupelian provided many
illustrations from today's news of how - as the book's subtitle says -
"radicals, elitists and pseudo-experts sell us corruption disguised as freedom."
He was introduced by Heritage Vice President Rebecca Hagelin.
By David
Kupelian
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
Thank you, Rebecca, I really appreciate that
generous introduction. And thanks also to all the gracious people here at the
Heritage Foundation for hosting this event.
It's nice to be back in my
old neighborhood. I live out in the great Northwest now, but I grew up just a
few miles from here - in Montgomery County, Maryland.
I remember walking
home from school and watching "The Lone Ranger" and "The Mickey Mouse Club" on a
little black-and-white TV. We didn't get MTV or Howard Stern. I liked pop songs
like "The Battle of New Orleans" and "The One-Eyed, One-Horned, Flying Purple
People Eater"; I had never heard rap stars ranting in monotone about killing
policemen or raping women. I don't think I had ever heard of abortion or
homosexuality. All my friends seemed to have both a mother and a father in the
home.
Even school was OK. We pledged allegiance to the flag every day,
and no one ever threatened to put me in jail if we said the words "Under God."
And no one taught me that Columbus was actually a genocidal murderer, or that
the Pilgrims abused the Indians, or that America was a racist, oppressive, evil
nation.
I thought America was the best country on earth.
In fact,
back then, everyone just knew America was the greatest and noblest of nations.
This is where I'm supposed to say: What a difference 50 years can make.
But how if I put it this way? What a difference 50 years - plus a few really
wickedly brilliant marketing campaigns - can make in transforming a nation.
I call my book "The Marketing of Evil" because that is exactly what we are
dealing with - the packaging and perfuming and gift-wrapping of destructive
philosophies and behaviors and selling them to the American people as though
they had great value.
But before we jump into specifics, I'd like to
take a minute to tell you a little story about myself, so you can understand why
I would write a book about evil.
I lost a dozens of family members in the
Turkish genocide of the Armenians - perhaps over a hundred - including my
grandfather, who was a doctor. The cruelty and evil that was inflicted on these
innocent people was unimaginable. My father - who was then just a little boy,
along with his mother barely escaped with their lives - on horseback, yet. To
make a long and harrowing story very short, eventually, my dad and grandmom
broke away from the barbarism and sadistic brutality that claimed 1.5 million of
their countrymen. And they managed to get on a ship and make the long ocean
voyage to the one country that welcomed them and offered them the opportunity
for a new life - America.
It was hard here, very hard. My dad took a job
as a school janitor when he was nine years old, to support himself and his
mother.
But, Dad and Grandmom persevered and went to college and built
lives for themselves. Along the way, my dad met my mom, they got married, pretty
soon settled right here in D.C. and had a family. I was the middle of three
kids, and my father became, basically, a rocket scientist, working to defend
this nation. I remember as a kid seeing his business card, which said "U.S. Army
Chief Scientist for Ballistic Missile Defense." I didn't know exactly what that
meant, but it sounded really cool.
Now my grandmother, many years later
decided to go back to the Old Country one last time to visit her relatives, and
she took me with her. It was memorable, but the most memorable part for me
occurred the night we returned to America. We landed at New York's Kennedy
Airport, but because we missed our connecting flight to Washington, we slept in
the terminal's second-floor lounge.
At some point, Grandmom shuffled off
to the ladies' room. But when she came back, she described for me - her voice
brimming with excitement - how everything in the restroom was so clean and shiny
and modern, how there was hot and cold running water, how everything worked
perfectly - so absolutely different from where we had just been. And she told me
she was so grateful for being back in the U.S.A. that she felt like kneeling
down and kissing America - right there on the floor of the restroom in JFK
airport.
I have absolutely no doubt that Grandmom's feelings, her love
for this country, were typical of millions of immigrants. America was just the
greatest, noblest, most generous nation on earth - I knew it, she knew it, we
all knew it.
That was then.
Today, untold numbers of us have
learned to hate America. In our absurdly expensive colleges, teaching contempt
for America is absurdly normal. You have no idea how many Ward Churchills are
out there, poisoning your kids' minds.
Then there's the antiwar movement,
which of course includes some sincere people who think the war was a mistake.
But most prominent are those like we saw last weekend here in D.C. who openly
expressed a visceral hatred - not just for the president or his administration -
but for America herself. Cindy Sheehan, so revered by the news media, said of
America, and I quote: "This country is not worth dying for."
The leaders
and organizers of these demonstrations, like last Saturday's, are groups openly
aligned with terrorist and communist regimes. Groups like ANSWER, which the
Washington Post described as "one of the main antiwar groups coordinating
today's events." The Post didn't see fit to mention that ANSWER is just a front
group for the ultra-leftist Workers World Party, which enthusiastically supports
North Korea and other dangerous, wacko regimes, and even worse - supports the
courageous "Iraqi resistance" who are killing our troops in Iraq.
But
anti-Americanism is just one troubling behavior. Today, millions of Americans
have embraced all sorts of beliefs and behaviors that would have horrified their
parents' generation - in fact, would have shocked the heck out of every
generation of Americans since the Declaration of Independence was signed.
What kinds of beliefs and behaviors?
Unrestricted abortion, which
is legal throughout America right up to the very moment of birth.
A
bizarre and self-destructive youth culture.
Rampant divorce that's
obtainable for practically any reason - and a 50 percent marriage failure rate
to prove it.
Outlawing the 10 commandments and prayer in public places.
Teaching homosexuality to 5-year-olds in our public schools.
The
almost total disintegration of traditional sexual mores, so we've got this
epidemic of sex among 11-, 12-, 13- and 14-year-olds in our nation's middle
schools.
How on earth did we get here? What has really caused this dramatic
transformation of America in our lifetimes?
In "The Marketing of Evil," I
show how many Americans have been manipulated, lied to and deceived into
abandoning out nation's core, Judeo-Christian values. And I show how this has
been accomplished by means of the same tactics and tricks Madison Avenue uses to
sell us cars and cigarettes and the latest fashions.
Fifty years ago,
Vance Packard's best-selling book "The Hidden Persuaders" showed Americans how
the advertising industry employed powerful techniques of mental and emotional
manipulation. Putting aside the questionable ethics of seducing someone to buy
something he doesn't really need - or in some cases that isn't even good for him
- the fact is, marketers discovered a dazzling new world of tools and techniques
for inducing people to buy.
Marketers today, whether they're selling
cigarettes or a worldview, target our feelings, our emotions - in fact, they
target our weaknesses - not our reason.
For instance, we all know about
the Marlboro Man, the Phillip Morris ad campaign that made Marlboro the world's
best-selling cigarette. Now really, what does that cowboy on a horse have to do
with cigarettes? Nothing, but the image somehow gave millions of men positive
feelings of freedom and independence and masculinity, and those feelings in turn
were attached to that particular brand of cigarette.
So let's say this
guy views the Marlboro ad a number of times - the ad does its work on him - and
then he goes into a 7-Eleven to buy cigarettes, and says, "Gimme a pack of
Marlboros." Why not another brand? Unconsciously, he wants to rekindle that
feeling of freedom and ruggedness he derived from the Marlboro Man image. How?
By lighting up a cigarette.
If this sounds like armchair psychology:
Sorry, but that in a nutshell is the last 50 years of marketing. Stimulate
certain feelings, and then you attach those feelings to your product.
Still, how do you take a belief or behavior that's bad and self-destructive and
dress it up and package it so it looks good? How does child molesting become
"man-boy love?" How does crushing a baby's skull and sucking out her brains
become a "constitutional right"? How does quoting the Bible become "hate
speech"?
In the next few minutes, let's take a look at a few specific
examples of marketing madness.
I started off my book with "gay rights,"
because the marketers of that agenda, more than any other, were so incredibly
clear and detailed and brazen in explaining how to manipulate Americans'
attitudes.
The gay rights marketing bible, titled "After the Ball," was
authored by two very bright, Harvard-educated marketers: Marshall Kirk and
Hunter Madsen. They lay out many versatile techniques of persuasion - all of
them enormously manipulative and intimidating. Let's focus in on just two of
them: "desensitization" and "jamming."
Basically, desensitization means
if you repeat something outrageous - even something outrageously false - over
and over and over again, people will gradually become less and less outraged and
eventually accept it. For instance, here's what our gay marketing gurus write
about desensitizing Americans about homosexuality. They say:
The main
thing is to talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome. Seek
desensitization and nothing more. ... If you can get straights to think
homosexuality is just another thing - meriting no more than a shrug of the
shoulders - then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won.
What about "jamming"? Jamming has been called "psychological terrorism."
Remember how the Soviets used to jam the signal when Radio Free Europe would
broadcast behind the Iron Curtain? Today "jamming" literally means silencing
your critics or opponents by attacking and intimidating them. Fair, unfair, it
doesn't matter - you attack the other side any way you can to get him to shut
up. American policy debate is full of jamming.
If you criticize any
of America's self-appointed black leaders like Jesse Jackson, you risk being
called a racist. And of course, most politicians fear being called a racist more
than they fear their own death. Say anything critical of the radical homosexual
activist agenda, no matter how well-intentioned, and you will be attacked as a
bigot and a homophobe and a hater. No real debate is tolerated. Criticize the
government for astronomical spending on social programs, and Sen. Kennedy will
excoriate you for being uncaring, mean-spirited, and for hating old people on
fixed incomes - and very likely being a racist, too. That's jamming.
These techniques dominate our national debate. Take a look at the illegal
immigration issue.
Ever wonder why we don't seem to hear the world
"illegal" anymore with regard to illegal aliens? And where did this word
"undocumented" come from?
Have you noticed how the phrase "illegal
aliens" has morphed into "illegal immigrants," then "undocumented immigrants,"
then "undocumented workers," even "guest workers"? My gosh, "undocumented guest
workers" - that phrase is so positive, it makes me feel like moving out of my
house and letting them just move in. Poor "undocumented guest workers" -
undocumented must mean they lost their documents, and they're our guests, and
they're working hard - I mean, what could be better than that?
This is
big-time desensitization. We're losing our sense of outrage over having 10 to 15
million illegal aliens basically invading our country. We're being desensitized
to the fact that illegal immigration is illegal - it's a crime, remember? People
who, for whatever reasons, don't want our immigration laws to be enforced, use
the word "undocumented" instead of illegal. And - this is critical - the news
media complete the sales job by picking up the label and using it on us day in
and day out.
I mean, here's Gov. Richardson on "Hannity & Colmes" saying
that 65,000 "undocumented workers" had been apprehended near the New Mexico
border in the last year. Excuse me, governor, but how do you know they were all
"workers"? They were still at the border and didn't all have time to land jobs.
Maybe some were "undocumented terrorists."
Language is extremely
powerful. Don't think we're just playing word games around the edges here. This
is core. The Constitution is all just "words." The Declaration of Independence
and the Bible are all just "words." Change the meaning of words and you change
reality. Abortion is legal in America because of a single word: choice. The
early abortion marketers figured out that it would be much easier to defend an
abstract, positive-sounding principle like "choice" than the unrestricted
slaughter of unborn babies. The news media bought the label and the "pro-choice"
battle was basically won almost before it started. How can you be against
"choice"?
Another example: What's the No. 1 marketing phrase of the left
these days? "Bush lied." It's almost a branded trademark. "Bush lied us into
war." There are several variations. "Bush lied about Saddam's WMD." "Bush lied,
thousands died."
Do you remember the shock you felt the very first time
you heard the phrase, "Bush lied"? The accusation teetered on the edge of
civilized debate, it was like Howard Dean on drugs. (Or, Howard Dean not on
drugs.) Now, you have "Peace Mom" Cindy Sheehan being worshiped by the press.
Here's some of what she called the president of the United States, and I quote:
a "jerk," an "evil maniac," a "lying bastard," a "terrorist," a "war criminal,"
a "gangster" and a "murderous thug."
Desensitization. When you hear this
kind of rhetoric day after day, before long you lose your sense of outrage, you
just get worn down. Worse, you start to believe it. Intimidation is a powerful
force, and most of us don't know how to deal with it without giving in one way
or the other. If enough people are saying Bush is a liar, it must be true,
right? Remember what psychologist William James said: "There's nothing so absurd
but if you repeat it often enough people will believe it."
Now, here's
another technique that comes in really handy - in fact, it's essential - when
you're involved with the marketing of evil. It's called lying. To make bad stuff
look good, you have to lie about it.
Take abortion. In "The Marketing of
Evil," I interview the co-founder of America's abortion movement, Bernard
Nathanson. He founded the largest abortion clinic in the Western world, and
co-founded NARAL, the vanguard group that got abortion legalized in New York in
the 1960s. Most impressively, he sat around with a few others and literally made
up the original marketing slogans, "freedom of choice" and "women must have
control over their own bodies." Here's what Nathanson told me. Quote: "I
remember laughing when we made those slogans up. ... They were very cynical
slogans then, just as all of these slogans today are very, very cynical."
In other words, they knew they were just conjuring up deceptive marketing
messages.
Nathanson today admits he and his abortion
colleagues lied left and right. They fabricated statistics and poll results and
fed them to a willing news media. What's the most powerful abortion marketing
slogan of all? "Women are dying." It just seems to trump all other points. In
the years before Roe v. Wade, we always heard that 5,000 to 10,000 women were
dying every year in the U.S. from illegal, botched abortions. This is what
Nathanson and his abortion marketer cohorts were claiming. But it wasn't true -
not even close - and they knew it.
Some people say, "Hey, Nathanson is a
pro-lifer now, so how can you believe his criticisms of the abortion industry?"
If you don't believe Nathanson, do you believe the Centers for Disease
Control? Do you know how many women actually died from illegal, botched
abortions in 1972, the last full year before Roe v. Wade? According to the CDC,
it wasn't 5,000 or 10,000, it wasn't even 1,000 - it was 39.
Suppose we
were told 10,000 U.S. soldiers had died in the Iraq war, and that death rate
influenced us to pull out, and then things got immeasurably worse because we
left? And suppose we later found out that 10,000 Americans hadn't actually died
in Iraq, but only 39. Wouldn't we feel betrayed?
Americans were betrayed
by abortion marketers, and particularly, by the news media who were convinced
legalized abortion was an enlightened and progressive change America needed. And
so they joined in the propaganda campaign that led to Roe v. Wade.
Let's
look at another hot issue - "the constitutional separation of church and state"
There's a good marketing slogan for you - proof that if you repeat something
enough times, people will believe it. Listen, I have a $10,000 reward for anyone
who can find the word "separation" or "church" or "state" in the first
Amendment.
Yet, there are very few phrases more familiar to Americans. My
colleagues in the press, in particular, repeat this phrase like a hypnotic
mantra. Can't you just hear it? "Attorneys for the ACLU, citing the
constitutional separation of church and state, today announced they were suing
God" - or whatever. Marketers pay millions to brand their product or political
candidate like this phrase.
This is another sneaky manipulation of words.
For 150 years after the Bill of Rights, the First Amendment phrasing about an
"establishment of religion" meant the federal government would not impose a
national church, a particular denomination, on the states. Today, we're made to
feel that just whispering something about God, the Bible, the Ten Commandments
or, Heaven forbid, praying on public property, constitutes an illegal
"establishment of religion."
Do you remember, right after Sept. 11, 2001,
a California public school erected a banner that simply said "God Bless
America," to honor those killed in the 9-11 terror attacks? That banner was
immediately attacked by the ACLU as an unconstitutional establishment of
religion. Does anyone - anyone at all - really believe the founders intended
this?
Now let's talk about perhaps the most important part of our lives -
our children. I don't think there's any place where the marketers of evil are
more soulless than in selling sex and rebellion to our kids. In terms of
dollars, the teen market is worth literally hundreds of billions - that's with a
B. Do you know what these giant entertainment corporations do in order to suck
as much money out of your kids as possible?
They hold focus groups, they
send out "culture spies" (which they call "correspondents") to pretend to
befriend and care about teens, so they can study them - to figure out how best
to separate them from their parents' money. They engage in "buzz marketing"
(that's where undercover agents disguised as "one of the crowd" talk up a new
product). They hire shills to interact with your kids in Internet chat rooms. In
other words, they bring the entire machinery of modern market research and
consumer psychology to bear on studying this gold mine of a market - your
children.
Do you have any idea how many beautiful children have herpes
and Chlamydia and other sexually transmitted diseases that they may never get
over, all because they listened to some evil marketer who sold them on easy sex?
In my book, I expose the actual techniques that are used to seduce young people
into rebelling against their parents and getting sucked into the sexual
revolution.
Let me pose a riddle for you.
Suppose a book came out
next week, a book on sex, it became an international bestseller, and the author
was elevated by the mainstream media to the stature of national hero? And yet,
what if you read this book and discovered that, right there in black and white,
it detailed, explicitly and approvingly, hundreds of actual instances of sex
acts between adults and children, including infants and toddlers, down to a few
months of age. Remember, we're talking non-fiction.
Wouldn't you say,
"Whoa, where did the author get this stuff? It's a felony, under any
circumstances, to be having sex with little children. Something's terribly wrong
here"?
Guess what? What I described is not hypothetical. I've described
the international best-seller, "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male" by Dr. Alfred
C. Kinsey, published in 1948.
Kinsey was worshipped by the press as a
great scientist, a family man and a courageous researcher, advancing our
scientific knowledge of human sexuality. In reality, Alfred C. Kinsey was a bona
fide sexual psychopath, as any of his several recent biographies will prove.
The detailed tables I just mentioned - of infants and children having been
molested by "researchers" using stopwatches to time and quantify their supposed
sexual responses - are horribly real. It's on Tables 30-34. Don't believe me, go
to your library and check it out. I can't repeat in a family setting like this
what things were actually done to these poor kids, but if you read Kinsey's own
words, you'll see that he was promoting nothing less than the sexual torture of
hundreds of little children, reminiscent of the infamous Nazi doctor Josef
Mengele. Two of the "researchers" he relied on most were serial pedophile Rex
King and convicted Nazi criminal Fritz von Balluseck.
Here's the riddle,
are you ready? How come nobody spoke up on behalf of these children that were
sexually abused in Kinsey's best-selling book? The crimes were recorded right
there in black and white. How come nobody said, "Wait a minute, hello, anybody
home? How could this mad scientist have obtained this 'data' without the
commission of horrible crimes? Why is he famous, instead of in prison?"
Why did it take until 1981, some 33 years after the book's publication, before
one lone researcher - Judith Reisman, a Ph.D. scholar - finally blew the
whistle?
What happened to us? Did we take stupid pills?
Do we just
become unthinking zombies when someone puts on a white coat and calls himself a
scientist?
Yes, we do.
Kinsey's ghoulish "research" into childhood
sexuality obviously didn't bother people too much back then. And in truth, it
doesn't bother us very much today. Most people hearing this information will be
shocked for about five minutes, and then, with the crush of other concerns and
responsibilities, they'll just move on to something else - and it'll be
forgotten.
But it's not forgotten out there in the culture. The entire
edifice of the sexual revolution in all its forms - rampant promiscuity, gay
rights, abortion, pornography, and so on - including the latest liberation
movement, coming soon, the mainstreaming of adult-child sex - you heard it here
first, trust me - all stems from Kinsey and his research, on which these
movements still rely for their scientific justification.
And yet, this
was arguably the worst case of junk science in the 20th century.
We were
conned - big time. But why did we fall for it? William Penn gave us a clue: "Men
must be governed by God, or they will be ruled by tyrants."
You see,
after WWII, Americans had developed a near-worship of science. In earlier eras,
men of God were the wise men of society. Today, scientists - no matter what
their secret, private agenda, no matter what sort of hidden, insane, inner
rebellion against God that may possess them - are our priesthood. Disputing
Kinsey would have been like disputing Scripture. It would almost be sacrilege.
Whether in commercials, where we see an actor with a white coat and a
stethoscope, or in real life, we recognize scientists and professors and
"researchers" and other "experts" as our authorities and give their words more
credibility than our own God-given common sense - even if what they say makes no
sense.
The bottom line is: The more we fall away from our Judeo-Christian
roots, as individuals and as a nation, the more we are powerfully attracted to
these social revolutionaries and other wackos, and all the corruption and misery
they ingeniously package as freedom and progress.
We're getting to the
end, so it's time to ask the question: Is there any hope?
Of course
there's hope. There's hope for each one of us, and for our families on the
individual level, and there's also hope for this, the greatest of nations.
Individually, this mindless rebellion so many of us have fallen for, against
our nation's founding Judeo-Christian values - in pursuit of bogus liberation
movements and insane philosophies - has to end. Or it'll kill us. We need to
truly honor God, and the 10 Commandments, and the Sermon on the Mount once more.
But there's one more thing we must do. To deal with the nasty influences out
there in our culture, Americans need to learn, and teach their children, the
principle of standing up to evil with grace.
These "marketers of evil,"
as I like to call them, prevail, more than anything else, by confusing and
intimidating us into losing our bearings, into doubting what we once knew was
right, and following them. To counter this, we just need to develop grace under
pressure - Ronald Reagan had it - that wonderful, lighthearted ability to look
someone straight in the eye, even if they're lying to us, and not to be
intimidated or confused or upset by them. That way, their wacko agenda stays
with them, and doesn't infect us, or our kids.
[Note: Kupelian is referring above indirectly to
the two great stabilities which only God can give us: 1. ontological
stability of our being, our personhood, and 2. moral stability of knowing the
difference between right an wrong, and acting on it. See
How do we Live
this Life in the Trinity? sermon by E. Fox]
As for the big picture,
one of the most hopeful changes I see in America is the growth of what we call
the New Media.
I make the statement in "The Marketing of Evil" that no
institution in America is more complicit, more responsible for making evil look
good and good look evil than the news media. Because it is the filter through
which we all get our information.
[I would
elect rather the church, the school system, and spiritually vapid families,
virtually fatherless families -- they get our young minds and hearts before
anyone else. When they get strong, things will change.
E. Fox]
The press has the power to expose and
debunk the marketers of evil at every turn. But it also has the power to carry
forward their message and to give it underserved credibility. And that,
unfortunately, is mostly what the press has done for the last few decades.
But what if a diligent, courageous and doggedly truth-oriented news media
were there to expose lies and deception for what they are? It wouldn't really
matter so much what the marketers of evil did or said, would it?
[Yes, doggedly truth-oriented. The first step toward
faith is commitment to being a
truth-seeker (see
The Authority of the Bible
in a Scientific World. E. Fox]
The New
Media - the Internet, talk radio, cable news, bloggers - everything that
counterbalances the entrenched secular left media entities like the New York
Times and the big broadcast networks, are a great awakening influence in
America.
One tiny personal example: The organization I serve as managing
editor, WorldNetDaily.com, recently reported on a new, scholarly book about to
be published, which explicitly endorsed adult-child sex. We ran the story on
page 1 on Monday, and on Wednesday I was contacted by the publishing company,
Haworth Press, which said they had decided not to publish this book after all.
After hearing from a lot of angry readers, they wanted everyone to know they
were not interested in supporting child abuse of any sort, and cancelled the
book.
One small step for mankind, right? Just one of the many daily
battles that the New Media are waging. But think about this: Suppose the press
had done that when Kinsey was publishing his best-selling pro-pedophilia book
that started the sexual revolution. Maybe America could have avoided some of the
heartache and misery that have wracked and ruined so many millions of lives in
the decades since then.
That's why I wrote "The Marketing of Evil." My
intent is to expose these people, and the hidden techniques they've been using
for decades to trip us up, to confuse us, and make us doubt the truth we once
knew. It's a nasty game, and the stakes are very high - but thank God, once we
understand how it works, the game is over.
Thank you very much.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Watch David Kupelian's speech presented at the
Heritage Foundation here.
L
"The Marketing of Evil" by David Kupelian
is in stock and available. Get your copy autographed and personalized, only from
ShopNetDaily! Order three copies for only $49.95, and get free
shipping too!
If you wish to order by phone, call our toll-free order
line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
David Kupelian is vice president and managing editor of WorldNetDaily.com and
Whistleblower magazine, and author of the best-selling book, "The Marketing of
Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as
Freedom.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|
Go to: => TOP Page; Spiritual Warfare; ROAD MAP |
Date Posted - 11/02/2010 - Date Last Edited - 11/02/2010